Effects of the Mindful Somatic Psychoeducation Program on the Mental Health of Unmarried Mothers: A Randomized Control Trial

Article information

Psychiatry Investig. 2025;22(8):897-905

Publication date (electronic) : 2025 July 31

doi : https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2025.0056

So-Jung Kim ¹^,^*

, Jae-Hon Lee ²^,^*

, Hwi-young Cho^,³

, Inkyoung Park^,⁴

¹Department of Sports Science, University of Suwon, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea

²Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada

³Department of Physical Therapy, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea

⁴Department of Sport Science, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Correspondence: Hwi-young Cho, PhD Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Gachon University, 191 Hambangmoe-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-32-820-4560, Fax: +82-32-820-4449 E-mail: hwiyoung@gachon.ac.kr

Correspondence: Inkyoung Park, PhD Department of Sport Science, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-2970-6367, Fax: +82-2972-9763, E-mail: pik77812@nate.com

*These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received 2025 February 10; Revised 2025 May 28; Accepted 2025 June 22.

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effects of the mindful somatic psychoeducation program (MSPP) on the mental health of unmarried mothers.

Methods

Sixteen unmarried mothers with children aged 0–5 years were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG, n=8) or control group (CG, n=8). The IG participated in an 8-week MSPP, while the CG maintained their usual routines. Pre- and post-assessments included the Resilience Quotient (RQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Physical Self-Description Questionnaire. Quantitative data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann–Whitney U tests. Qualitative interviews were analyzed using Giorgi’s phenomenological method.

Results

The IG showed significant improvements in self-regulation, positivity, and overall resilience (p<0.05). Anxiety and depression levels significantly decreased (p<0.05), and self-esteem improved (p<0.05), while no significant changes were found in the CG. Qualitative findings revealed: 1) changes in the soma (e.g., improved posture, pain relief), 2) enhanced mind–body integration (e.g., emotional regulation through breath and movement), and 3) increased mindfulness and self-regulation (e.g., reduced self-blame, improved parenting responses).

Conclusion

This study confirmed that MSPP helps unmarried mothers experience positive changes in physical, psychological, and social variables. These results serve as empirical foundational data for expanding the application areas of the MSPP and for research aimed at promoting the health of unmarried mothers.

Keywords: Anxiety; Depression; Physical exercise; Resilience

INTRODUCTION

An unmarried mother is a woman who gives birth without a legal marriage [1]. In Korea, there were 20,345 unmarried mothers in 2021, though the actual number may be higher [2]. The number of unmarried mothers raising children has increased globally [3]. These women face significant challenges balancing economic and parenting responsibilities [4], and often experience mental confusion, economic hardship, family conflict, and social prejudice [5]. Additionally, 73.5% of unmarried mothers suffer from postpartum depression, which is higher than the general population [6]. Furthermore, they are also at increased risk for mental health issues such as anxiety and parenting stress [7-9].

Parenting stress is exacerbated by lack of personal time, low confidence in parenting, and sleep deprivation, which can negatively affect psychosocial well-being and quality of life [10-12]. The accumulation of negative emotions can lead to the development of negative thought patterns, which may ultimately result in inappropriate behavior [13]. Resilience, the ability to recover from adversity, is crucial for unmarried mothers and is closely linked to negative emotions [14].

The psychological state of the primary caregiver is vital for the child’s development and parent-child interactions [3]. Mothers with depression are more likely to display irritability and negative behaviors toward their children [15]. Thus, supporting unmarried mothers benefits not only the individuals but also their children, highlighting the need for broader community or national support.

This study aimed to implement a mindfulness-based somatic psychoeducation program to enhance the physical and psychological health of unmarried mothers. Mindfulness-based programs have demonstrated psychosocial benefits [16-18], but addressing both psychological and physical health is necessary due to the challenges of pregnancy, childbirth, and parenting [19,20]. In this study, we provided the mindful somatic psychoeducation program (MSPP) to unmarried mothers, incorporating not only mindfulness but also sensory-motor learning to enhance their sensory and motor skills. Somatic psychoeducation has evolved from multidisciplinary theories that emerged from experiential inquiries into the body, breath, and states of being. It is also regarded as a form of alternative medicine, often referred to as “body therapies” or “intuitive restoration of self.” [21]

Mind-body therapy programs are gaining increasing attention in both practice and research for their proven safety and physical, psychological, and social benefits [22]. Recent implementations of mindfulness-based somatic education for female college students have shown positive changes in anxiety, stress, and social connectedness among participants [23]. The MSPP helps individuals focus on the present, experience their movements from within, and become aware of their bodily sensations, thereby inducing relaxation and reducing negative emotions connected to the body. This process enhances personal awareness, sensory perception, and positive emotions [24]. Furthermore, studies related to the practical application of MSPP have reported its effectiveness in some participants.

However, research remains limited on the effectiveness of such programs for unmarried mothers experiencing physical decline and heightened negative emotions due to childbirth and parenting. This study thus aimed to implement an MSPP for unmarried mothers and evaluate its effectiveness through both quantitative and qualitative methods.

METHODS

Study design and procedure

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Suwon (USWIRB 2310-045-01) and included protocols to protect participants’ rights, safety, confidentiality, and recruitment. This single-blind randomized controlled trial assigned participants to either the intervention group (IG) or control group (CG) using an SPSS-generated randomization sequence. Pre- and post-intervention measurements were conducted under blinded conditions using standardized face-to-face questionnaires. Confidentiality was ensured through anonymized, number-coded samples. Qualitative data on participants’ internal experiences were collected through one-on-one interviews.

Participants and data collection

Participants were recruited over 15 days through open calls targeting unmarried mothers with children aged 0–5 years via an internet café and social media. Twenty eligible individuals voluntarily enrolled after receiving full information and providing written consent. They were randomly assigned to either the IG or CG; four withdrew early or were excluded from analysis. Inclusion criteria were: 1) unmarried mothers with children aged 0–5, 2) no musculoskeletal or cognitive impairments, and 3) no regular exercise (less than 3 times/week). Exclusion criteria included smoking and participation in other programs.

Sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1.9 (Kiel University), requiring 16 participants for 0.95 power, α=0.05, and effect size=0.4. Prior studies and Tisdell and Merriam [25] suggest groups of 6–10 participants enhance engagement and effectiveness, with previous evidence supporting 8–9 per group.

Intervention

The IG underwent MSPP intervention once a week, 2 hours per session, for 8 weeks, whereas the CG performed the same activities as usual in daily life for 8 weeks. The only difference between the two groups was whether MSPP was performed. The MSPP was led by a sports psychology doctor with extensive yoga experience and was conducted with guidance from various clinical experts.

The MSPP was developed based on four key components: 1) the researcher’s more than 15 years of experience teaching meditation and yoga, 2) psychoeducation content for postpartum females, 3) an adapted MSPP program for female college students, and 4) Thomas Hanna’s Somatics. The program integrates mindful meditation (e.g., breathing focus, present-moment awareness, gratitude), somatic movements (Hanna’s somatics, Nadi Shodhana Pranayama, body scans, yoga-based exercises) [26,27], and emotional expression through sharing thoughts, feelings, and daily experiences (Table 1).

Table 1.

Program contents for the mindful somatic psychoeducation

The body movements of the MSPP focused on two key areas: 1) Hanna’s somatic exercises targeting trunk flexors to release tension and prevent habitual red-light reflex patterns commonly seen in single mothers under distress and 2) interventions for trunk extensors to reduce issues related to excessive green-light reflex, such as back pain, herniated discs, and temporo-mandibular joint disorders.

Measurement

Resilience

Resilience was measured using the Resilience Quotient (RQ) developed by Reivich and Shatté [28] and adapted in Korean by Kim [29]. The 53 questions assessed three main factors: self-regulation ability, interpersonal relationships, and positivity. However, considering that participants could be negatively affected by the survey process, 35 questions were used to measure self-regulation ability and positivity factors, excluding interpersonal factors (e.g., “Most of the people I meet regularly come to hate me”). This study drew upon previous research that utilized selected sub-factors of the RQ based on resilience theory [30,31].

Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) between the questions was 0.091 overall, and was calculated as a self-regulation ability of 0.906 and a positivity of 0.947.

Anxiety and depression

Anxiety and depression were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) developed by Zigmond and Snaith [32] and translated into Korean and validated by Oh et al. [33]. This 14-item scale comprises seven anxiety (e.g., “I felt fear”) and seven depression (e.g., “I felt lonely as if I was alone in the world”), and allows you to check your emotions over the past week. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The internal consistency between the items (Cronbach’s α) was 0.867 for anxiety and 0.557 for depression.

Physical Self-Description

Physical Self-Description was measured by using the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire (PSDQ) developed by Marsh et al. [34] and translated into Korean and validated by Kim [35]. For the composition of the questionnaire, appearance (e.g., “My face is handsome”), health (e.g., “It takes me a long time to get better once I am sick”), and self-esteem (e.g., “I think I’m a failure in life”) were selected among the sub-factors of the PSDQ, and the questionnaire was composed of four questions, a total of 12 questions. This study drew upon previous research that utilized selected sub-factors of the PSDQ [36,37].

Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Internal consistency between items (Cronbach’s α) was calculated at 0.874 for physical appearance and 0.85 for health and 0.843 for self-esteem.

One-on-one interviews

One-on-one personal interviews were conducted to confirm the content experienced by MSPP participants during the program. They were asked open-ended interview questions: “What did you experience in the process of participation in the program?” and “Have you changed physically and psychologically since the program?” and “Have you had any changes in your daily life?.”

Statistical analysis and assurance of rigor

The data collected using the questionnaires were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0 (IBM Corp.). First, to assess the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance, the Levene’s test was performed, respectively. Second, the Wilcoxon sign ranking test was used for paired nonparametric comparisons to investigate differences within and between groups, and the effect size was confirmed through Cohen’s r to compare substantial differences. The level of significance for all results was set at p<0.05.

In this study, data collected through interviews were analyzed using Giorgi’s phenomenological lens to confirm and interpret the participants’ experiences. Data obtained through the interviews were transcribed and anonymized, and qualitative data were classified using inductive content analysis.

In addition, yoga experts, psychological counselors, sports psychology professors, and psychiatrists who did not participate in this study ensured the rigorous and ethical standards of the collected data.

RESULTS

General characteristics

Of the 20 recruited study participants, two were of higher child age, and two refused to participate in the study immediately before conducting the study. Thus, 16 participants participated, and none of them were eliminated from the study over the next 8 weeks, and attendance was 100% (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Flow diagram.

A total of 16 unmarried mothers in their 20s to 40s were randomly assigned to IG and CG. Levene’s test indicated no significant difference in age between the groups (F=2.496, p=0.136). Although significant differences were found in the equal variance test for anxiety (F=6.588, p=0.022) and health (F=5.185, p=0.039), all variables met the assumption of normality based on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (Table 2).

Table 2.

The general characteristics of participants

Quantitative analysis results

Resilience

After the intervention, IG showed notable improvements in resilience, including self-regulation and positivity, while CG did not experience meaningful changes. Also, overall resilience also increased in IG compared to CG (Table 3).

Table 3.

The changes of psychological variable

Anxiety and depression

IG showed clear reductions in both anxiety and depression scores following the program, whereas CG showed no significant changes (Table 3).

Physical self-description

There were no meaningful changes in appearance or health perception in either group. However, self-esteem improved in IG, while no change was observed in CG (Table 3).

Qualitative analysis results

In-depth interviews were conducted to confirm the changes in detail while the study participants performed the program. The results of analyzing the interview contents were as follows: changes in the soma (physical, psychological, and social), changes in mind-body integration (breath-mind connectedness, movement, and mind connectedness), and changes in the subjectification of the soma (mindfulness and self-regulation).

Changes in the soma

Physical soma

In the case of single mothers who must bear childbirth and are rearing alone, their physical structure and function are likely to weaken. However, most participants experienced improvements in posture correction, imbalance relief, pain relief, bodily flexibility, and digestive problems after participating in the MSPP (Supplementary Table 1).

Psychological soma

Before the program, participants reported feeling anxious, depressed, self-destructive, or helpless. During MSPP, many experienced reduced anxiety and depression, along with increased positive thinking and a calmer mind. Some noted persistent uneasiness due to constant thoughts about their tasks, but even without major life changes, they felt slightly more at ease (Supplementary Table 1).

Social soma

When initially asked to recall things, they were grateful for, participants were unable to identify any. However, after completing the program, they recognized many aspects of their lives and people—such as parents, friends, spouses, and children—for whom they felt appreciation. Some also shared that they previously struggled to respond appropriately to their children’s words or actions, but after the program, they became more capable of observing and responding calmly (Supplementary Table 1).

Changes in mind-body interaction

Breath-mind connectedness

MSPP encouraged participants to focus on deep breathing. Initially, many felt dizzy or found it hard to follow. However, over time, they reported feeling lighter, experiencing reduced headaches and chest tightness, and overall improvement in physical and mental well-being through slow, deep breathing (Supplementary Table 2).

Movement and mind connectedness

Participants initially struggled with physical movements, especially while managing childcare. By the end, they reported feeling more relaxed and confident through stretching and gradual movement improvement. Some noted that movement improved mood and mental clarity, while others felt their mindset changed first, which then enhanced movement. They appreciated the opportunity to focus on themselves, saying it helped them recognize their needs and connect with their bodies (Supplementary Table 2).

Changes in the subjectification of the soma

Mindfulness

Participants previously believed they maintained good relationships simply by avoiding conflict. After MSPP, they realized that understanding and expressing their own thoughts and emotions was key to building healthy connections. Mindfulness helped them recognize and regulate emotions, reduce reactive behavior, and improve communication with others, including their children (Supplementary Table 3).

Self-regulation

Many had difficulty maintaining healthy routines due to parenting stress. Before MSPP, they were aware of poor habits but lacked energy or motivation to change. After the program, they reported improved breathing and calmer responses in stressful situations. They were less reactive, engaged in positive self-talk, and expressed gratitude instead of blame. Participants noted a shift from feeling powerless to feeling capable and hopeful, using internal dialogue such as “I can do it too” to support themselves (Supplementary Table 3).

DISCUSSION

Postpartum females experience various physical discomforts such as musculoskeletal pain, breast pain, digestive issues, headaches, and fatigue, and require sufficient rest and proper physical activity for recovery [38]. However, unmarried mothers often lack rest due to responsibilities like childcare and financial hardship, resulting in psychological distress including confusion, anxiety, fear, depression, and helplessness.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the MSPP, designed to improve the physical and mental health of unmarried mothers.

First, the MSPP significantly enhanced resilience, particularly self-regulation and positivity. These findings align with Kim and Lee [26], who reported that yoga and meditation promoted resilience in unmarried mothers, and Sarkissian et al. [39], who found improved resilience in adolescents practicing yoga. Participants also reported increased emotional awareness, fewer negative responses, and reduced anger toward their children. Such improvements support better stress management and well-being [40]. While family relationships and social prejudice may intensify emotional strain for unmarried mothers, resilience improvement through MSPP may help foster emotional stability and social adaptation.

Second, reductions in anxiety and depression were observed. These conditions are common in unmarried mothers managing both caregiving and financial demands. Depression can result from genetic and environmental factors as well as neurotransmitter imbalances, often leading to posture changes known as the red-light reflex—characterized by a shrunken torso, increased front tension, and restricted breathing [27,41]. MSPP included exercises focused on chest expansion, deep breathing, and muscle relaxation to address these symptoms. These outcomes support prior findings that mindfulness and somatic movement improve psychological health [23,42], and align with studies like Forbes [41] and Simpkins and Simpkins [40] showing reductions in anxiety and depression through thoracic-expanding postures. Other yoga-based interventions have also demonstrated therapeutic value [43-45].

Third, while no significant change was seen in appearance or perceived health, MSPP did improve self-esteem, a key aspect of physical self-description (Table 3). Interviews revealed less self-loathing and more positive self-perception. Participants also reported improvements in back and pelvic pain, digestive issues, and fatigue, suggesting potential long-term benefits that may appear in future quantitative data if the intervention continues.

The limitations of this study include: 1) the small sample size, which limits generalizability; 2) the inability to control for all personal and environmental factors during the recruitment process; 3) the sample representativeness was limited due to online recruitment; and 4) the absence of follow-up data limits our understanding of the sustainability of the results. Additionally, interpersonal skills were excluded from resilience measurement after expert consultation, although qualitative responses suggested some positive changes in social perception occurred.

In conclusion, MSPP effectively enhanced resilience and selfesteem while reducing anxiety and depression in unmarried mothers. These results highlight MSPP’s potential as a practical mental health intervention and suggest its applicability in community support services and policy efforts.

Future research should explore online delivery methods for broader access, especially for single mothers constrained by time and space. Studies comparing online and offline delivery are needed, and if similar effects are confirmed, scalable content can be developed. Programs involving both mothers and children should also be considered. Furthermore, future work should revise resilience tools to include interpersonal components, given their relevance to emotional recovery and social functioning.

Supplementary Materials

The Supplement is available with this article at https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2025.0056.

Supplementary Table 1.

Qualitative analysis of soma changes

pi-2025-0056-Supplementary-Table-1.pdf

Supplementary Table 2.

Qualitative analysis of changes in mind-body integration

pi-2025-0056-Supplementary-Table-2.pdf

Supplementary Table 3.

Qualitative analysis of changes in soma subjectification

pi-2025-0056-Supplementary-Table-3.pdf

Notes

Availability of Data and Material

The data analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: So-Jung Kim, Jae-Hon Lee, Inkyoung Park. Data curation: So-Jung Kim, Jae-Hon Lee. Formal analysis: Jae-Hon Lee, Inkyoung Park. Funding acquisition: Hwi-young Cho. Investigation: So-Jung Kim, Inkyoung Park. Methodology: all authors. Project administration: So-Jung Kim, Inkyoung Park. Supervision: Hwi-young Cho. Writing—original draft: So-Jung Kim, Jae-Hon Lee. Writing—review & editing: Hwiyoung Cho, Inkyoung Park.

Funding Statement

The National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT): RS-2022-NR074290.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their deepest gratitude to all the participants who actively participated in this study.

References

1. Chung Y, Son S. No good choices: concealing or disclosing single motherhood in Korea. Soc Work Res 2022;46:162–175.

2. Statistics Korea. Report on the Number of Unmarried Mothers in Korea, 2021 [Internet]. Available at: https://www.mogef.go.kr/nw/rpd/nw_rpd_s001d.do?mid=news405&bbtSn=708567. Accessed March 22, 2024.

3. Kang H, Rigazio-Digilio SA, Super CM, Halgunseth LC. Resilience and well-being of Korean unwed mothers: a moderated mediation model. J Child Fam Stud 2023;32:1332–1343.

4. Taylor ZE, Conger RD. Promoting strengths and resilience in single-mother families. Child Dev 2017;88:350–358.

5. Kwon YS, Kim SY. A narrative inquiry on the alienation experience of a home parenting unmarried mother. Couns Psychol Educ Welf 2023;10:41–53.

6. Kim JE, Lee JY, Lee SH. Single mothers’ experiences with pregnancy and child rearing in Korea: discrepancy between social services/policies and single mothers’ needs. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:955.

7. Ranta M, Punamäki RL, Chow A, Salmela‑Aro K. The economic stress model in emerging adulthood: the role of social relationships and financial capability. Emerging Adulthood 2020;8:496–508.

8. Basu S, Rehkopf DH, Siddiqi A, Glymour MM, Kawachi I. Health behaviors, mental health, and health care utilization among single mothers after welfare reforms in the 1990s. Am J Epidemiol 2016;183:531–538.

9. Liang LA, Berger U, Brand C. Psychosocial factors associated with symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress among single mothers with young children: a population-based study. J Affect Disord 2019;242:255–264.

10. Mercer RT. The process of maternal role attainment over the first year. Nurs Res 1985;34:198–204.

11. Talib JA, Mohamad Z, Ab Raji NA, Husain Z, Yusof RAAM, Ramley F, et al. Coping, resilience and stress among single mothers in Terengganu, Malaysia. Int J Manag 2020;11:1859–1871.

12. Kim J, Kim H. The relationship between economic strain and quality of life. Qual Life Res 2020;29:847–856.

13. Nylocks KM, Rafaeli E, Bar-Kalifa E, Flynn JJ, Coifman KG. Testing the influence of negative and positive emotion on future health-promoting behaviors in a community sample. Motiv Emot 2019;43:285–298.

14. Xu Y, Ni Y, Yang J, Wu J, Lin Y, Li J, et al. The relationship between the psychological resilience and post-traumatic growth of college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a model of conditioned processes mediated by negative emotions and moderated by deliberate rumination. BMC Psychol 2024;12:357.

15. Panaccione VF, Wahler RG. Child behavior, maternal depression, and social coercion as factors in the quality of child care. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1986;14:263–278.

16. Ryu S, Cho H. A qualitative analysis of the effects of the online mindful lovingkindness-compassion program (MLCP) on social anxiety of university students. Korean J Medit 2020;10:65–95.

17. Kabat-Zinn J, Massion AO, Kristeller J, Peterson LG, Fletcher KE, Pbert L, et al. Effectiveness of a meditation-based stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1992;149:936–943.

18. Teasdale JD, Segal ZV, Williams JM, Ridgeway VA, Soulsby JM, Lau MA. Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:615–623.

19. Bang KS, Kim S, Jeong Y, Song MK, Lee G, Lim J. An analysis of research on parenting stress of unmarried mothers in Korea. STRESS 2019;27:287–297.

20. Davenport MH, Marchand AA, Mottola MF, Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Jaramillo Garcia A, et al. Exercise for the prevention and treatment of low back, pelvic girdle and lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2019;53:90–98.

21. Bihari JLN, Mullan EG. Relating mindfully: a qualitative exploration of changes in relationships through mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Mindfulness 2014;5:46–59.

22. Morgan N, Irwin MR, Chung M, Wang C. The effects of mind-body therapies on the immune system: meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e100903.

23. Yook YS, Lee JH, Park I, Cho HY. Effects of online mindful somatic psychoeducation program on mental health during the COVID-19. Psychiatry Investig 2024;21:63–73.

24. Alexander K. Integrative review of the relationship between mindfulness-based parenting interventions and depression symptoms in parents. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2018;47:184–190.

25. Tisdell EJ, Merriam SB, Stuckey-Peyrot HL. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation (5th ed) Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2025.

26. Kim SJ, Lee YH. Effectiveness of yoga training programs to reduce depression and improve resilience of single mothers. J Exerc Rehabil 2022;18:104–109.

27. Hanna T. Somatics: reawakening the mind’s control of movement, flexibility, and health New York: Hachette Books; 2024.

28. Reivich K, Shatté A. The resilience factor: 7 essential skills for overcoming life’s inevitable obstacles New York: Broadway Books; 2002.

29. Kim JH. Resilience Seoul: Wisdom House Publishing; 2011. p. 66–72.

30. Ungar M, Liebenberg L. Assessing resilience across cultures using mixed methods: construction of the child and youth resilience measure. J Mix Methods Res 2011;5:126–149.

31. Yu J, Chae S. The mediating effect of resilience on the relationship between the academic burnout and psychological well-being of medical students. Korean J Med Educ 2020;32:13–21.

32. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–370.

33. Oh SM, Min KJ, Park DB. A study on the standardization of the hospital anxiety and depression scale for Koreans: a comparison of normal, depressed and anxious groups. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1999;38:289–296.

34. Marsh HW, Richards GE, Johnson S, Roche L, Tremayne P. Physical self-description questionnaire: psychometric properties and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of relations to existing instruments. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1994;16:270–305.

35. Kim BJ. Development and validation of the Korean version of the physical self-description questionnaire (PSDQ). Korean J Sport Psychol 2001;12:69–90.

36. Dolenc P. The short form of the Physical Self‑Description Questionnaire: validation study among Slovenian elementary and high school students. J Psychol Educ Res 2016;24:58–74.

37. Papaioannou A, Bebetsos E, Theodorakis Y, Christodoulidis T. Causal relationships of sport and exercise involvement with goal orientations, perceived competence and intrinsic motivation in physical education: a longitudinal study. J Sports Sci 2006;24:367–382.

38. Li M, Li D, Bu J, Zhang X, Liu Y, Wang H, et al. Examining the factors influencing postpartum musculoskeletal pain: a thorough analysis of risk factors and pain assessment indices. Eur Spine J 2024;33:517–524.

39. Sarkissian M, Trent NL, Huchting K, Singh Khalsa SB. Effects of a Kundalini yoga program on elementary and middle school students’ stress, affect, and resilience. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2018;39:210–216.

40. Simpkins CA, Simpkins AM. Yoga & mindfulness therapy workbook for clinicians and client Eau Claire: Pesi Publishing & Media; 2014.

41. Forbes B. Yoga for emotional balance: simple practices to help relieve and anxiety and depression Boston: Shambhala Publications, Inc; 2011.

42. Remskar M, Western MJ, Osborne EM, Maynard OM, Ainsworth B. Effects of combining physical activity with mindfulness on mental health and wellbeing: systematic review of complex interventions. Ment Health Phys Act 2024;26:100575.

43. Duan-Porter W, Coeytaux RR, McDuffie JR, Goode AP, Sharma P, Mennella H, et al. Evidence map of yoga for depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder. J Phys Act Health 2016;13:281–288.

44. Gallagher A, Kring D, Whitley T. Effects of yoga on anxiety and depression for high risk mothers on hospital bedrest. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2020;38:101079.

45. Payne L, Usatine R. Yoga Rx: a step-by-step program to promote health, wellness, and healing for common ailments New York: Harmony Books; 2009.

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Table 1.

Program contents for the mindful somatic psychoeducation

Session	Program contents
Session	Meditation & imagery (30 min)	Somatics & yoga (60 min)	Expression (30 min)
1 (Orientation)	1. Program description	Breath, Nadi Shodhana Pranayama (alternate nostril breathing), sensing, arch & flatten, arch & curl, back lift, Baddha Konasana (butterfly pose), Marjaryasana (cat pose), Bitilasana (cow pose), Adho Mukha Svanasana (downward-facing dog pose), Kapotasana (peason pose), Eka Pada Rajakapotasana (one-legged king pigeon pose), Pavatasana (mountain pose), Ustrasana (camel pose), Bhujangasana (cobra pose), Pavanamuktasana (wind-relieving pose), Savasana (corpse pose-put a block on your back), body scan	Sharing motivation
	2. Activities to form a rapport
	3. Focus on breathing
2 (Emotion)	1. Breath counting meditation	Breath, Nadi Shodhana Pranayama, sensing, arch & flatten, back lift, the washrag, Baddha Konasana, Marjaryasana, Bitilasana, Adho Mukha Svanasana, Kapotasana, Eka Pada Rajakapotasana, Pavatasana, Ustrasana, Bhujangasana, Pavanamuktasana, Savasana (corpse pose-put a block on your back), body scan	Sharing one’s emotion
	2. Feel the full presence
	3. Perception of emotion
	4. Thinking of good emotion
3 (Cause)	1. Breath counting meditation	Breath, Nadi Shodhana Pranayama, sensing, arch & flatten, back lift, diagonal arch and curl, the flower, the washrag, Pavatasana, Vyaghrasana (tiger pose), Phalakasana (plank pose), Dhanurasana (bow pose), Adho Mukha Svanasana, Marjaryasana, Bitilasana, Bhujangasana, Virabhadrasana (warrior pose), Utthita Trikonasana Paschimottanasana (extended triangle pose), Pavanamuktasana, (corpse pose-put a block on your back), body scan	Sharing the problem
	2. Here and now
	3. Looking at the problem
	4. Mindfulness and stress
4 (Self-optimism)	1. Breathing meditation	Breath, Nadi Shodhana Pranayama, sensing, arch & flatten, arch & curl, back lift, skiing, steeple twist, Eka Pada Rajakapotasana Kapotasana, Adho Mukha Svanasana, Bhujangasana, Marjaryasana, Bitilasana, Matsyasana (fish pose), Eka pada Jathara Parivarttanasana, Halasana (plow pose), Pavanamuktasana, Savasana (corpse pose-put a block on your back), body scan	Sharing the past that overcame the ordeal
	2. Look for ways to think positively
	3. Recalling the past that overcame the ordeal
	4. Thinking about hope
5 (Control)	1. Breathing meditation	Breath, Nadi Shodhana Pranayama, sensing, arch & flatten, back lift, the flower, hip hikes, human X, the washrag	Share thought control experience
	2. Stop thinking practice	Tadasana, Kapotasana, Eka Pada Rajakapotasana, Krounchasana (heron pose), Paschimottanasana (seated forward bend pose), Halasana (plow pose), Bhujangasana, Adho Mukha Svanasana, Phalakasana, Dhanurasana (bow pose), Pavanamuktasana
	3. Breathing pump practice
	4. Here and now
6 (Positivity)	1. Breathing meditation	Breath, Nadi Shodhana Pranayama, sensing, arch & flatten, back lift, diagonal arch & curl, the washrag, steeple twist, Pavatasana, Vyaghrasana, Phalakasana, Dhanurasana, Adho Mukha Svanasana, Marjaryasana, Bitilasana, Bhujangasana, Virabhadrasana (warrior pose), Utthita Trikonasana Paschimottanasana (seated forward bend pose), Pavanamuktasana, Savasana (put a block on your back), body scan	Sharing happy memories/future
	2. Recall yourself who was successful in the past
	3. Think about yourself who was happy
	4. Imagine yourself successful in the future
7, 8 (Thanks)	1. Loving-kindness meditation	Breath, Nadi Shodhana Pranayama, sensing, arch & flatten, back lift, diagonal arch & curl, the washrag, the propeller, Eka Pada Rajakapotasana, Kapotasana, Adho Mukha Svanasana, Bhujangasana, Marjaryasana, Bitilasana, Matsyasana, Eka Pada Jathara Parivarttanasana, Halasana, Pavanamuktasana, Savasana (corpse pose-put a block on your back), body scan	Expressing gratitude
	2. Recall thankful work
	3. Self-talk about gratitude
	4. Hug yourself

Variables	Total	IG (N=8)	CG (N=8)	Levene’s
Variables	Total	IG (N=8)	CG (N=8)	F	p
Age (yr)	31.500±8.058	29.125±8.887	33.875±6.875	2.496	0.136
20s	7	5	2
30s	5	1	4
40s	4	2	2
Resilience (scores)
Self-regulation ability	57.750±8.426	57.500±6.118	58.000±10.704	0.631	0.440
Positivity	47.875±12.093	48.500±10.677	47.250±14.089	1.319	0.270
Total	105.625±16.488	106.000±14.081	105.250±19.594	0.519	0.483
Anxiety (scores)	21.875±4.911	21.125±3.182	22.625±6.346	6.588	0.022
Depression (scores)	20.500±3.033	20.875±1.727	20.125±4.051	4.341	0.056
Physical self-description (scores)
Appearance	2.984±0.863	2.625±0.790	3.343±0.823	0.504	0.489
Health	2.344±1.048	2.250±0.627	2.438±1.393	5.185	0.039
Self-esteem	1.828±0.597	2.031±0.633	1.625±0.518	0.179	0.678

Factors (scores)	Group	Pre	Post	Post-pre	Z	p	ES (Cohen’s r)
Overall resilience	IG	106.000±14.081	144.125±15.236	38.125±15.896	-2.524	0.012	0.892
	CG	105.250±19.594	102.250±22.789	-3.000±34.801	-0.140	0.889	0.050
Self-regulation ability	IG	57.500±6.118	72.000±9.986	14.500±10.515	-2.521	0.012	0.891
	CG	58.000±10.704	53.250±10.700	-4.750±12.151	-1.122	0.262	0.397
Positivity	IG	48.500±10.677	72.125±7.039	23.625±14.412	-2.524	0.012	0.892
	CG	47.250±14.089	49.000±14.222	1.750±25.672	-0.280	0.779	0.099
Anxiety	IG	21.125±3.182	12.250±4.713	-8.875±4.357	-2.527	0.012	0.893
	CG	22.625±6.346	22.500±6.071	-0.125±6.534	-0.085	0.932	0.030
Depression	IG	20.875±1.727	13.875±3.907	-7.000±4.276	-2.527	0.012	0.893
	CG	20.125±4.051	20.500±3.928	-0.375±5.041	-0.339	0.735	0.120
Appearance	IG	2.625±0.791	2.875±0.779	0.250±1.126	-0.682	0.495	0.241
	CG	3.344±0.823	2.844±0.999	-0.500±1.433	-0.938	0.348	0.332
Health	IG	2.250±0.627	2.656±0.981	0.406±1.420	-0.561	0.574	0.198
	CG	2.438±1.394	2.062±0.691	-0.375±1.696	-0.338	0.735	0.198
Self-esteem	IG	2.031±0.633	2.906±0.412	0.875±0.641	-2.527	0.012	0.893
	CG	1.625±0.518	1.781±0.508	0.156±0.876	-0.531	0.595	0.188